How a contract resolves, and why that matters more than the price

Every contract carries a resolution section: which source is consulted, at what time, and what happens in the awkward cases. Traders skim it. It is the only part that pays.

The same question is not the same contract

Two venues can list what looks like an identical event and resolve it against different sources, on different clocks, with different language about what counts. When the world does something ambiguous (a delayed announcement, a revised figure, a partial outcome), those differences stop being pedantic and start being the entire position.

The headline question is the marketing. The resolution criteria are the asset.

What to read before you size

1. The named source. An official release, a specific publication, or a discretionary committee are three very different risks wearing the same sentence.
2. The cutoff. Timezone and instant. A surprising amount of disagreement is a clock disagreement.
3. Revisions. If the source restates a number after settlement, does the contract care? Usually not, and that asymmetry is tradeable.
4. The edge cases. Cancellation, postponement, ties, partial satisfaction. If the rulebook is silent, someone decides later, and that someone is not you.

Read the resolution first, then look at the price. In that order, a surprising number of apparently obvious trades stop looking obvious.